Brown v. Benbow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Brown v. Benbow

1913 OK 46, 128 P. 909, 36 Okla. 716, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 947

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 21, 1913

Docket2030

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 46 (Brown v. Benbow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Benbow, 1913 OK 46, 128 P. 909, 36 Okla. 716, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 947 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was filed in the district court of Grady county, June 2, 1910, by R. L. Brown against the defendants for the sum of $2,000, alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by defendants, Georgiana Ben-bow and John Benbow to Elizabeth Dean, which note was alleged to have been assigned before maturity by Elizabeth Dean to plaintiff herein. After filing the suit, plaintiff, procured an order of attachment which was executed by levying upon certain property of defendants; and from an order dissolving such attachment, this appeal was taken.

The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court October 1, 1910. No briefs have been filed by either party. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed for failure to file briefs as required by the rules of this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was filed in the district court of Grady county, June 2, 1910, by R. L. Brown against the defendants for the sum of $2,000, alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by defendants, Georgiana Ben-bow and John Benbow to Elizabeth Dean, which note was alleged to have been assigned before maturity by Elizabeth Dean to plaintiff herein. After filing the suit, plaintiff, procured an order of attachment which was executed by levying upon certain property of defendants; and from an order dissolving such attachment, this appeal was taken.

The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court October 1, 1910. No briefs have been filed by either party. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed for failure to file briefs as required by the rules of this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 46, 128 P. 909, 36 Okla. 716, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-benbow-okla-1913.