Brown v. Bass

277 S.E.2d 480, 276 S.C. 211, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 20, 1981
Docket21430
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 S.E.2d 480 (Brown v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Bass, 277 S.E.2d 480, 276 S.C. 211, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 340 (S.C. 1981).

Opinion

Littlejohn, Justice:

This court must determine whether residential restrictive covenants were properly amended to' allow a trailer to be placed upon a restricted lot. We affirm the order of the trial judge finding the attempted amendment invalid and ordering the trailer removed.

In 1979, defendants. Wayne Clybum and Linda Barr offered to purchase a restricted lot from defendant James Bass, the owner, if a trailer could be moved onto the lot. Bass thereafter approached other lot owners within the subdivision with a petition attempting to amend the restrictive covenants. Plaintiff Doris R. Brown, a lot owner, refused to sign the petition.

The purported amendment reads, in part, as follows:

[213]*213“PETITION
Date Sept. 18, 1979
I, (WE), the undersigned property owners do hereby certify that I, (WE), have no objection to a mobile home being placed on the property of [defendants]. Our property line is less than 100 feet from said mobile home.”

The petition is clearly inadequate on its face to amend the covenant prohibiting trailers. Nowhere does the petition purport to serve as an amendment to the subdivision restrictions ; in fact, there is no reference whatsoever to the existence of any such restrictions. One lot owner testified that he signed the petition without knowledge that any covenants even applied to the land.

Under these circumstances, Brown was entitled to have the petition declared an ineffective amendment and to enforce the covenant forbidding trailers. Accordingly, the order of the lower court is

Affirmed.

Lewis, C. J., and Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinard v. Richardson
754 S.E.2d 888 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 S.E.2d 480, 276 S.C. 211, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-bass-sc-1981.