Brown v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.

287 U.S. 563, 53 S. Ct. 6, 77 L. Ed. 497, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 36
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1932·No. No. 46·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The mo[564]*564tion of the appellees to affirm the decree herein, and for an award of damages pursuant to § 878, Title 28, U. S. Code, is denied. The appeal in this cause is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Western Crawford Road Improvement District, 266 U. S. 187; Miller & Lux v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District, 256 U. S. 129; Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U. S. 254.

Messrs. Wm. H. Watkins and A. F. Gardner for appellants. Messrs. Julian C. Wilson and Walter P. Armstrong for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co., 287 U.S. 563, 53 S. Ct. 6, 77 L. Ed. 497, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 36 (1932).

287 U.S. 563 (Brown v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related