Brown v. Baker

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Baker

286 F. App'x 103

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2008·No. No. 08-6162·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). Brown also appeals the court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Baker, No. 7:07-cv-00574-jlk-mfu, 2008 WL 62177 (W.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2008; [104]*104Jan. 18, 2008; Feb. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). Brown also appeals the court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Baker, No. 7:07-cv-00574-jlk-mfu, 2008 WL 62177 (W.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2008; [104]*104Jan. 18, 2008; Feb. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Baker, 286 F. App'x 103 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

286 F. App'x 103 (Brown v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related