Brown v. Atwell

31 Me. 351
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 Me. 351 (Brown v. Atwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Atwell, 31 Me. 351 (Me. 1850).

Opinion

Tenney, J., orally.

The admission of the officer, who made the' service, cannot affect the judgment in the manner contended for by the defendants. This case is clearly distinguishable from those relied on in the argument. So far as [353]*353the record shows, the justice had jurisdiction and the judgment was properly rendered. The defendants are bound by the judgment, until it be reversed. The defendants had no rights in the wheel, except what they derived from the officer. They are his bailees, and are not permitted to invoke the illegalities of the judgment. Whether the judgment were rightful or wrongful, or there were no judgment at all, the officer is bound, to account for the property.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holcomb v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.
40 N.W. 354 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Me. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-atwell-me-1850.