Brown v. Atwell

541 F. App'x 717
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1844
StatusPublished

This text of 541 F. App'x 717 (Brown v. Atwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Atwell, 541 F. App'x 717 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Brown appeals the district court’s1 dismissal, with prejudice, of her complaint arising out of a 2005 motor-vehicle accident, which was the subject of a lawsuit she brought in Missouri state court in 2007. The district court, adopting the report and recommendations of the magistrate judge, concluded that Brown’s complaint was barred under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, see D.C. Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923), and that, in any event, it was time-barred. Upon careful de novo review, we agree that the complaint was barred by the statute of limitations and affirm on that basis. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
263 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1924)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 F. App'x 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-atwell-ca8-2013.