Brown v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.

125 S.E. 795, 33 Ga. App. 194, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 815
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Ga. App. 429
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1924·No. 14621·Published

Opinion

Bell, J.

The Supreme Court, on certiorari, having reversed the judgment of this court by which a new trial was ordered solely because of an alleged error in the charge of the court (see Brown v. Atlanta Northern Ry. Co., 31 Ga. App. 429 (2), 120 S. E. 677), that judgment is hereby vacated and the opinion withdrawn in so far as it relates to such alleged [195]*195error; and the judgment of the trial court overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial stands affirmed.

Decided December 15, 1924. Mozley & Gann, 11. B. Moss, for plaintiff. Colquitt & Conyers, John T. Dorsey, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenldns, P. J., amd Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co., 125 S.E. 795, 33 Ga. App. 194, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 815 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

125 S.E. 795 (Brown v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.
120 S.E. 677 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)