Brown v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Brown v. Armstrong

30 A. 461, 18 R.I. 537, 1894 R.I. LEXIS 68

DecidedMarch 28, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A. 461 (Brown v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Armstrong, 30 A. 461, 18 R.I. 537, 1894 R.I. LEXIS 68 (R.I. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the- assignee being a grantee in the conveyances made by Charles H. Armstrong alleged to he fraudulent, is an unsuitable person for the office of assignee, since his interest as a grantee is necessarily. in conflict with his duty as assignee. The prayer of the petition for his removal is, therefore, granted. The petition will stand for further hearing on the question of the appointment of a receiver, or assignee, in the place of the said John R. Armstrong.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the- assignee being a grantee in the conveyances made by Charles H. Armstrong alleged to he fraudulent, is an unsuitable person for the office of assignee, since his interest as a grantee is necessarily. in conflict with his duty as assignee. The prayer of the petition for his removal is, therefore, granted. The petition will stand for further hearing on the question of the appointment of a receiver, or assignee, in the place of the said John R. Armstrong.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A. 461, 18 R.I. 537, 1894 R.I. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-armstrong-ri-1894.