Brown v. Armstrong
30 A. 461, 18 R.I. 537, 1894 R.I. LEXIS 68
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the- assignee being a grantee in the conveyances made by Charles H. Armstrong alleged to he fraudulent, is an unsuitable person for the office of assignee, since his interest as a grantee is necessarily. in conflict with his duty as assignee. The prayer of the petition for his removal is, therefore, granted. The petition will stand for further hearing on the question of the appointment of a receiver, or assignee, in the place of the said John R. Armstrong.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Armstrong, 30 A. 461, 18 R.I. 537, 1894 R.I. LEXIS 68 (R.I. 1894).
30 A. 461 (Brown v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.