Brown v. Ansel

63 S.E. 449, 82 S.C. 141, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 8
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 26, 1909·No. 7097·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After reading the petition herein, the Court is of the opinion that rule to show cause should not issue. Even if the Governor is subject to our writ of mandamus, a question noticed but not decided in State v. Ansel, 76 S. C., 406, 57 S. E., 185, it appears from the petition that the act sought to be compelled is not a plain ministerial duty, but involves the exercise of discretion, and is, therefore, not compellable by mandamus. See section 580, Civil Code, and State ex rel. Reese v. Ansel, 78 S. C., 331, 58 S. E., 933.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Ansel, 63 S.E. 449, 82 S.C. 141, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 8 (S.C. 1909).

63 S.E. 449 (Brown v. Ansel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blalock v. Johnston, Governor
185 S.E. 51 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)