Brown v. Angelone

12 F. App'x 113
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2001
Docket00-7748
StatusUnpublished

This text of 12 F. App'x 113 (Brown v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Angelone, 12 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Brandon Brown seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. *114 § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Brown v. Angelone, No. CA-00-462-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F. App'x 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-angelone-ca4-2001.