Brown v. American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc.

314 F. App'x 614

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1265

StatusPublished

This text of 314 F. App'x 614 (Brown v. American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., 314 F. App'x 614 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jullian L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., and denying her motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Am. Inst. for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., No. 8:06-cv-02935-RWT (D. Md. Oct. 1, 2007 & Jan. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jullian L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., and denying her motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Am. Inst. for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., No. 8:06-cv-02935-RWT (D. Md. Oct. 1, 2007 & Jan. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 F. App'x 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-american-institutes-for-research-in-the-behavioral-sciences-inc-ca4-2009.