Brown v. Adult & Family Services

616 P.2d 580, 48 Or. App. 232, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3833
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 15, 1980·No. No. 5-3301-YIG005-5, CA No. 16980·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This appeal is from an Adult and Family Services administrative hearing officers order ruling that the proceeds of a loan made to petitioner by petitioner’s mother to pay petitioner’s rent were a "resource” and "income” available to reduce petitioner’s need and, accordingly, her grant amount. The hearing officer’s ruling was based on OAR 461-04-025, OAR 461-04-205, OAR 461-04-030 and OAR 461-04-210, set out in the margin.1

We find that the hearing officer misinterpreted the administrative rules on which he relies, and the agency’s exercise of discretion was inconsistent with the cited rules. Under these rules, proceeds of a loan to pay rent are neither income nor a resource to the borrower; the loan must be repaid and is a liability, not an asset.

Reversed and remanded.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Adult & Family Services, 616 P.2d 580, 48 Or. App. 232, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3833 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

616 P.2d 580 (Brown v. Adult & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Adult and Family Services
643 P.2d 1266 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1982)
Brown v. ADULT & FAMILY SERVICES
625 P.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)