Brown v. Adgerson

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Adgerson

478 F. App'x 18

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2012·No. No. 12-6977·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Adgerson, No. 1:12-cv-01160-BEL (D. Md. filed Apr. 26, 2012; entered Apr. 27, 2012). We deny Brown’s pending motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Adgerson, No. 1:12-cv-01160-BEL (D. Md. filed Apr. 26, 2012; entered Apr. 27, 2012). We deny Brown’s pending motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Adgerson, 478 F. App'x 18 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 18 (Brown v. Adgerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.