Brown v. Access Community Capital
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6] SHAWN BROWN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01929-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ally. Order 9] ACCESS COMMUNITY CAPITAL, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 1] To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26- 12] 1(a). Although Defendants filed motions to dismiss, Docket No. 8, a request to stay discovery has 13] not been filed, cf Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 601 (D. Nev. 2011). If Defendants 14] seek a stay of discovery, they must file a motion seeking such relief by January 14, 2025. If such 15} a motion is filed, discovery will be stayed on an interim basis pending resolution of that motion. 16] If such a motion is not filed, a joint discovery plan must be filed by January 21, 2025. 18 Dated: December 31, 2024 UG. . 19 7 AN fo Nancy J“Kappe 20 United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Access Community Capital (Brown v. Access Community Capital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.