Brown v. 445 East 85th Street, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. 445 East 85th Street, LLC

52 A.D.3d 383, 858 N.Y.S.2d 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 383 (Brown v. 445 East 85th Street, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. 445 East 85th Street, LLC, 52 A.D.3d 383, 858 N.Y.S.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered June 29, 2007, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiffs motion for renewal of a prior order that had granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against the limited liability company for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The transcript submitted on the motion to renew failed to present any material facts not considered by the court on the original motion addressed to the question of service (see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568 [1979]). In any event, the newly submitted material would not have warranted a departure from the court’s initial ruling dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (see CPLR 311-a; National Heritage Life Ins. Co. v T.J. Props. Co., 286 AD2d 715 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Williams and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered June 29, 2007, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiffs motion for renewal of a prior order that had granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against the limited liability company for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The transcript submitted on the motion to renew failed to present any material facts not considered by the court on the original motion addressed to the question of service (see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568 [1979]). In any event, the newly submitted material would not have warranted a departure from the court’s initial ruling dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (see CPLR 311-a; National Heritage Life Ins. Co. v T.J. Props. Co., 286 AD2d 715 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Williams and Renwick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.3d 383, 858 N.Y.S.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-445-east-85th-street-llc-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack