Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney

Alabama Court of Appeals

Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney

104 So. 288, 20 Ala. App. 580, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 92

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1925

Docket8 Div. 157.

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 288 (Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney, 104 So. 288, 20 Ala. App. 580, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 92 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Tbis appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee (defendant) in a suit on account brought by appellant (plaintiff) in the circuit court of Marshall county. The appellant assigns but a single ground of er *581 ror — the overruling by the trial court of its motion for a new trial.

Under the familiar rule laid down in Cobb v. Malone & Collins, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738, wrhicb rule, substantially unchanged, yet prevails in tbis state, we cannot say that the court committed error iu the particular claimed. The evidence made an issue fairly for the jury, which was submitted under full, accurate, and clear instructions by the judge trying the case.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI