Brown, N., Aplt. v. Commonwealth and SCI Somerset
This text of Brown, N., Aplt. v. Commonwealth and SCI Somerset (Brown, N., Aplt. v. Commonwealth and SCI Somerset) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
NOEL BROWN, : No. 60 MAP 2022 Appellant : v. : . : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : AND ERIC TICE, SUPERINTENDENT : SCI-SOMERSET, : Appellees :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2022, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See
Pa.R.A.P. 341(b) (definition of a final order); Pa.R.A.P. 311 Note (specifying that Rule
311(c) “does not relate to a transfer under . . . 42 Pa.C.S. §5103 . . . because such a
transfer is not to a ‘court of coordinate jurisdiction’ . . . ; it is intended that there shall be
no right of appeal from a transfer order based on improper subject matter jurisdiction.”).
See also Pa.R.A.P. 910(a)(5) (“Only the questions set forth in the statement, or fairly
comprised therein will ordinarily be considered by the Court.”); PPL Generation, LLC v.
Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 986 A.2d 48, 58 n. 11 (Pa. 2009) (same).
Appellant’s Application for Leave to Supplement Jurisdictional Statement is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown, N., Aplt. v. Commonwealth and SCI Somerset, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-n-aplt-v-commonwealth-and-sci-somerset-pa-2022.