Brown & Ketcham Iron Co. v. L. P. Hazen & Co.
This text of 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 490 (Brown & Ketcham Iron Co. v. L. P. Hazen & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the authority of Ward v. Ward, 10 Circ. Dec. 656 (20 R. 136), we are of the opinion that the affidavit for attachment filed herein was void. This being so, did the giving of a bond by the defendant below to discharge the attachment have the effect of submitting the defendant to the jurisdiction of the court? We think not. See Saxton v. Plymire, 2 Circ. Dec. 118 (3 R. 209). The court therefore erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error to discharge the attachment, and said judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 490, 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 48, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-ketcham-iron-co-v-l-p-hazen-co-ohcircthamilton-1908.