Brown-Graves-Vincent Co. v. Deutchman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Brown-Graves-Vincent Co. v. Deutchman

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 780, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1524

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 22, 1924

DocketNo. 823

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 780 (Brown-Graves-Vincent Co. v. Deutchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown-Graves-Vincent Co. v. Deutchman, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 780, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1524 (Ohio Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

WASHBURN, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

The Brown Co. claims a mechanic’s lien on certain premises and the Akron Guaranteed Mtg. Co. claims a mortgage lien on the same property. The issue is as to whether the mechanic’s lien was waived.

The record shows that one Tuck, comptroller of the Brown Co., signed such waiver, his signature compared With his genuine signature and other like waivers of mechanics’ liens on behalf of the BroWn Co. justifies the inference of his authority in the premises. The mortgage company received said waiver .in exchange for money advanced to mechanics’ lien-holders. Affirming the Common Pleas, the Court of Appeals held:

1. The mechanics’ lienholder by signing a waiver in favor of the mortgage lien, enabling the former to obtain part of the loan which the mortgage wlas to secure, is estopped to assert priority over the mortgage.

2. Consideration for waiver of lien is sufficient if the mechanic’s lienholder derives benefit expressed or implied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI