Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission

883 F.2d 504, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13189
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 31, 1989·No. 87-5870·Published

Opinion

883 F.2d 504

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 87-5870, 87-5913.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1989.

Robert L. DeLaney, Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Jane P. North, and Michael J. Passino, Passino, DeLaney and Hildebrand, W.J. Michael Cody, Atty. Gen., William Barry Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for defendants-appellants.

L. Webb Campbell, Dearborn & Ewing, and Robert L. Echols, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.

Prior report: 109 S.Ct. 3208.

ORDER

Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge.*

ON REMAND FROM the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

UPON CONSIDERATION of the decision of that Court vacating the prior decision of this court, it is ordered that this cause be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light of Healy v. The Beer Institute, Inc., 491 U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2491, 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989).

*

The Honorable Barbara Hackett, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission, 883 F.2d 504, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13189 (6th Cir. 1989).

883 F.2d 504 (Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Healy v. Beer Institute
491 U.S. 324 (Supreme Court, 1989)