Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission
This text of 883 F.2d 504 (Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 87-5870, 87-5913.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 31, 1989.
Robert L. DeLaney, Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Jane P. North, and Michael J. Passino, Passino, DeLaney and Hildebrand, W.J. Michael Cody, Atty. Gen., William Barry Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for defendants-appellants.
L. Webb Campbell, Dearborn & Ewing, and Robert L. Echols, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.
Prior report: 109 S.Ct. 3208.
ORDER
Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge.*
ON REMAND FROM the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the decision of that Court vacating the prior decision of this court, it is ordered that this cause be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light of Healy v. The Beer Institute, Inc., 491 U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2491, 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989).
The Honorable Barbara Hackett, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
883 F.2d 504, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-forman-corporation-v-tennessee-alcoholic-beverage-commission-ca6-1989.