Brown, Eggers & Mitchell, Inc. v. Commissioner
Opinion
*557
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
WHITAKER,
This case is presently before the Court on petitioner's motion pursuant to section 7430 1 for an award of reasonable litigation costs. By notice dated December 12, 1983, respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax as follows:
| Additions to Tax | |||
| Section | Section | ||
| Fiscal Year Ended | Deficiency | 6653(a)(1) | 6653(a)(2) |
| 3/31/81 | $ 3,821 | $ 191 | 0 |
| 3/31/82 | 2,852 | 143 | 50% of int. |
| due on $ 2,852 | |||
Respondent's determination of deficiency resulted from his determination that petitioner was not entitled to deductions for "contracted administration" of $ 22,475 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1981, and $ 16,754 for the fiscal year ended March 21, 1982. On brief, respondent conceded that petitioner was*559 entitled to these deductions as ordinary and necessary business expenses. Petitioner filed its motion for reasonable litigation costs on September 23, 1985.
Petitioner's motion may be disposed of as not in compliance with Rule 231(a)(2) in that it was filed on September 25, 1985, which was prior to the 30-day period following service of a written opinion determining the issues in the case. See
Section 7430 provides that the prevailing party in civil tax cases may be awarded a judgment for reasonable litigation costs. The term "prevailing party" is defined in section 7430(c)(2) as a party that establishes that the position of the United States in the civil proceeding was unreasonable 2 and has either substantially prevailed with respect to the amount in controversy or has substantially prevailed with respect to the most significant issue presented. Respondent's position in this*560 case was nothing if not reasonable. As we found in our previous opinion, Kenneth A. Stoecklin, sole shareholder of petitioner, exercised complete control over petitioner. His refusal and hence petitioner's refusal to explain the nature of the "contracted administration" deduction led to respondent's determination of deficiency. 3 Upon discovering the nature of petitioner's "contracted administration" deduction, respondent was most timely in conceding the issue. Therefore, petitioner's motion must be denied.
*561
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1987 T.C. Memo. 517 (Brown, Eggers & Mitchell, Inc. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.