Brown, Caitlyn v. Kenneth Tucker

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided May 28, 2026·No. 157, 2026·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CAITLYN BROWN,1 § § No. 157, 2026

Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. CN20-04793

KENNETH TUCKER, § Petition No. 25-16646 §

Respondent Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: May 22, 2026

Decided: May 28, 2026

Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On April 15, 2026, the appellant, Caitlyn Brown, filed a notice of appeal from a March 27, 2026 Family Court order granting custody of the appellant’s children to the appellee “on a very temporary basis” and scheduling a review hearing for June 17, 2026. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to Brown to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. Brown has

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

responded to the notice to show cause and argues the merits of her appeal but does not address its interlocutory nature.

(2) An order constitutes a final judgment when it “leaves nothing for future determination or consideration.”2 Because the Family Court’s March 27 order did not finally resolve the merits of the appellee’s petition for custody modification, it was interlocutory.

(3) Absent compliance with Rule 42, the appellate jurisdiction of this Court is limited to the review of final trial court orders.3 Brown’s failure to comply with Rule 42 leaves this Court without jurisdiction to hear her interlocutory appeal. Brown may appeal once the Family Court issues a final order in the custody- modification proceedings.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rule 29(b).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice

2 Werb v. D’Alessandro, 606 A.2d 117, 119 (Del. 1992) (citation omitted).

3 Julian v. State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown, Caitlyn v. Kenneth Tucker, (Del. 2026).

Brown, Caitlyn v. Kenneth Tucker (Brown, Caitlyn v. Kenneth Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Julian v. State
440 A.2d 990 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1982)
Werb v. D'Alessandro
606 A.2d 117 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1992)