Brown, Bobby Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 18, 2015
DocketWR-1,499-30
StatusPublished

This text of Brown, Bobby Ray (Brown, Bobby Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown, Bobby Ray, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-1,499-28, 1,499-29, and 1,499-30

EX PARTE BOBBY RAY BROWN, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 98-67642, 98-02366, and 99-00990 IN THE 363rd DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three

separate theft offenses and he was sentenced to imprisonment for forty-five years, twenty years and

twenty years, respectively.

In his present applications, Applicant raises one ground for relief. These applications,

however, present a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed seven

prior applications pertaining each of these convictions. It is obvious from the record that Applicant 2

continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should

have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily

abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).

Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under

Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. These applications are

dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,

not to accept or file the instant applications for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future applications

pertaining to these convictions unless Applicant is able to show in such applications that any claims

presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous

application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: November 18, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. United States
373 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Ex Parte Bilton
602 S.W.2d 534 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Carr
511 S.W.2d 523 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brown, Bobby Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-bobby-ray-texcrimapp-2015.