Brown, Anthony Tyron
This text of Brown, Anthony Tyron (Brown, Anthony Tyron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,343-01
EX PARTE ANTHONY T. BROWN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. A12158-1 IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT FROM KERR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of delivery of less
than one gram of cocaine. TEX . HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 481.112(b). The offense was raised
from a state-jail felony to a third-degree felony because it occurred in a drug-free zone. Id. §
481.134(d). Applicant was sentenced to three years and six months’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that he is being denied review for parole. Applicant has alleged facts
that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we 2
held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the
appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General
Counsel to file an affidavit listing Applicant’s parole eligibility date, whether he has been reviewed
for parole and, if not, why not.
The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. If the trial court elects
to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and
wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant
at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant
is being reviewed for parole. If not, the trial court shall then make findings as to the reasons
Applicant is being denied parole review. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact
and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim
for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 10, 2014 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown, Anthony Tyron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-anthony-tyron-texcrimapp-2014.