Brown-Anglin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brown-Anglin v. State

591 So. 2d 682, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 1992 WL 5348

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1992

DocketNo. 91-421

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 682 (Brown-Anglin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown-Anglin v. State, 591 So. 2d 682, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 1992 WL 5348 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rogelio Brown-Anglin appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following a jury verdict of guilty as charged to one count of possession of cocaine. We find no merit to the issue raised on appeal. However, we correct a scrivener’s error on the judgment which indicates the appellant pled guilty to the offense. As modified, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

GOSHORN, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rogelio Brown-Anglin appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following a jury verdict of guilty as charged to one count of possession of cocaine. We find no merit to the issue raised on appeal. However, we correct a scrivener’s error on the judgment which indicates the appellant pled guilty to the offense. As modified, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

GOSHORN, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 682, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 1992 WL 5348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-anglin-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.