Brower v. State of Alaska

Opinion

3) NASH BROWER, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00330-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 9] STATE OF ALASKA, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On March 1, 2024, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Nash Brower did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF 9. Brower did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the 11} report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 15} objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation (ECF No. 9) is 17} accepted. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 19th day of March, 2024. 20 OIE a ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE