Brower v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Brower v. Smith

641 F. App'x 285

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 2016·No. No. 15-7977·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Brower appeals the district court’s order granting Dr. James Smith’s summary judgment motion on Brower’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims, and he has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brower’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. See Brower v. Smith, No. 5:13-ct-03240-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2015). We [286] dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Brower appeals the district court’s order granting Dr. James Smith’s summary judgment motion on Brower’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims, and he has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brower’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. See Brower v. Smith, No. 5:13-ct-03240-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2015). We [286] dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brower v. Smith, 641 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

641 F. App'x 285 (Brower v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related