Brower v. Sevier
This text of 264 A.D. 867 (Brower v. Sevier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, order denying defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from Suffolk county to Onondaga county reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The action is transitory and should be tried in the county where the contract was made; and it appears that a large number of material witnesses reside in Onondaga county. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 867, 35 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brower-v-sevier-nyappdiv-1942.