Brower v. McDonald's Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedApril 24, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-02099
StatusUnknown

This text of Brower v. McDonald's Corporation (Brower v. McDonald's Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brower v. McDonald's Corporation, (D. Nev. 2020).

Opinion

1 Dustin L. Clark, Esq. (Bar #10548) HOLLEY DRIGGS 2 400 South Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 3 Tel: (702) 791-0308 4 Email: dclark@nevadafirm.com

5 Stacey A. Campbell, (Colorado Bar #38378) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 6 Stacey@Campbell-Litigation.com Alison Lungstrum Macneill, (Colorado Bar #51689) 7 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 8 Alison@Campbell-Litigation.com CAMPBELL LITIGATION, P.C. 9 1571 Race Street Denver, Colorado 80206 10 Tel: (303) 536-1833 Attorneys for Defendant 11

12 Mary F. Chapman, Esq. (#6591) LAW OFFICE OF MARY F. CHAPMAN, LTD. 13 8440 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 203 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 14 Tel: (702) 202-4223 15 Email: maryf.chapman@juno.com Attorney for Plaintiff 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 18

DONNA BROWER, Case No.: 2:19-cv-02099-GMN-BNW 19

20 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION FOR THE ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 v.

22 MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation licensed to do business in Nevada, 23

24 Defendant.

25 Defendant McDonald’s Corporation (“Defendant” or “McDonald’s”) and Plaintiff 26 Donna Brower (“Plaintiff” or “Brower”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, 27 move the Court to approve the parties’ Joint Stipulated Protective Order to regulate and limit the 28 1 dissemination of confidential, proprietary, and/or personal information during this case. The 2 parties state as follows in support of this Joint Motion. 3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), this Court “may, for good cause, issue an order to 4 protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or 5 expense.” A blanket protective order places upon the parties themselves, or others from whom 6 discovery is sought, the initial burden of determining what information is entitled to protection; 7 and courts routinely approve blanket protective orders in civil cases. See Van v. Wal-Mart Stores, 8 Inc., C 08-5296 PSG, 2011 WL 62499, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2011) (citing Gillard v. Boulder 9 Valley School Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382, 386 (D.Colo.2000)). 10 Good cause exists to enter a blanket protective order in this case. Defendant and Plaintiff 11 agree that certain disclosures, discovery requests, depositions, and other proceedings in 12 connection with the above-captioned case, may require the disclosure of confidential, private, 13 and/or proprietary information. 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties the following Stipulated 15 Protective Order is needed to protect the parties, witnesses, and unrelated third parties from any 16 injury associated with the misuse of disclosed or exchanged information: 17 1. This Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) shall apply to all 18 information, documents, electronically stored information, and other materials disclosed, 19 produced, exchanged, or otherwise disseminated in this case, including without limitation, 20 documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, deposition 21 testimony, and other information disclosed, produced, or exchanged pursuant to procedures set 22 forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 23 2. As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in Fed. R. 24 Civ. P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this 25 term. 26 3. As used in this Protective Order, “electronically stored information” means any 27 type of information that can be stored electronically, and is intended to be broad enough to cover 28 all current types of electronically- and computer-based information. 1 4. Information, documents, electronically stored information, and/or other materials 2 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” (collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL material” or 3 “CONFIDENTIAL information”) shall be information, documents, electronically stored 4 information, and/or other materials that are confidential, such as: (a) non-party personnel records 5 of current or former employees of Defendant (other than Plaintiff); (b) any non-public personal 6 information, including credit or debit numbers, tax information, social security numbers, drivers’ 7 license numbers, and bank or financial account information or password information for any 8 person; (c) trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is either privileged or 9 confidential; (d) Protected Health Information; and (e) any other material qualifying for 10 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). “Protected Health Information” means 11 individually identifiable health information, including demographic information collected from 12 an individual that is created or received by a health care provider, health plan, employer, 13 or health care clearinghouse; and relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health 14 or condition of an individual, the provision of health care to an individual, or the past, present, 15 or future payment for the provision of health care to an individual, and identifies the individual; 16 or with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe that the information can be used to 17 identify the individual. 18 5. CONFIDENTIAL material shall not, without the consent of the party designating 19 it as CONFIDENTIAL (the “Designating Party”) or further Order of the Court, be disclosed 20 except that such information may be disclosed, solely for the purposes of this case to: attorneys 21 actively working on this case; persons regularly employed by or associated with the attorneys 22 actively working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for 23 trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case; the parties, including representatives of 24 Defendant; expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, if any, 25 to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial, or at other proceedings in this 26 case; the Court and its employees (“Court Personnel”); stenographic reporters who are engaged 27 in proceedings necessarily incident to the conduct of this action; and deponents, witnesses, or 28 potential witnesses; mediators; other persons by written agreement of the parties. 1 6. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose 2 except for the preparation, trial, and appeal of this case. 3 7. Information, documents, electronically stored information, and/or other materials 4 are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing (in a manner that will not interfere 5 with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice – “CONFIDENTIAL” – on every 6 page containing CONFIDENTIAL information. With the exception of depositions, which are 7 discussed below in Paragraph 9, information, documents, electronically stored information, 8 and/or other materials unintentionally produced without a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation or 9 produced before the Stipulated Protective Order is issued, may be retroactively designated in the 10 same manner. 11 8. Before any information is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” counsel of record 12 for the Designating Party must first review the information and make a determination, in good 13 faith, that the information, documents, electronically stored information, and/or other materials 14 are confidential or otherwise are entitled to protection pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Protective 15 Order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). 16 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District Re-2
196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colorado, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brower v. McDonald's Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brower-v-mcdonalds-corporation-nvd-2020.