Brower v. Leavitt

Oregon Supreme Court

Brower v. Leavitt

273 P. 721, 128 Or. 176, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 26

DecidedJanuary 16, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 273 P. 721 (Brower v. Leavitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brower v. Leavitt, 273 P. 721, 128 Or. 176, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 26 (Or. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint after a demurrer to his second amended complaint had been sustained. Defendant did not appear in the oral argument presented to this court. We have carefully considered the second amended complaint and the argument advanced by plaintiff in his own behalf orally and find that the complaint does not state a cause of action. We concur with the opinion of the learned *177 Circuit Court in this, that the alleged libelous article does not cast any reflection on plaintiff.

For that reason the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint after a demurrer to his second amended complaint had been sustained. Defendant did not appear in the oral argument presented to this court. We have carefully considered the second amended complaint and the argument advanced by plaintiff in his own behalf orally and find that the complaint does not state a cause of action. We concur with the opinion of the learned *177 Circuit Court in this, that the alleged libelous article does not cast any reflection on plaintiff.

For that reason the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 P. 721, 128 Or. 176, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brower-v-leavitt-or-1929.