Brower v. Lawrence
229 A.D. 729
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 229 A.D. 729 (Brower v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brower v. Lawrence, 229 A.D. 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent, being of opinion that among the covenants in the instrument is one of quiet enjoyment against acts of third parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brower-v-lawrence-nyappdiv-1930.