Brower v. Kantner
This text of 43 A. 7 (Brower v. Kantner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the decree dismissing the bill, at plaintiffs’ costs, for want of jurisdiction.
After referring to the material facts and fully considering the question of jurisdiction raised by the answers of some of the defendants, the learned president of the common pleas came to the conclusion that if the plaintiffs have a good cause of action, arising out of the averments of fact set forth in the bill, their remedy is not in equity, but at law, by a writ of quo warranto; and he accordingly dismissed the bill.
For reasons fullystated by him,-we are not only satisfied that this conclusion is correct, but we also think there is nothing in the specifications of error that requires further discussion.
The decree is therefore affirmed on his opinion, sent up with the record, and the appeal is dismissed at appellants’ costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A. 7, 190 Pa. 182, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brower-v-kantner-pa-1899.