Browder v. Nicholson

Federal Circuit

Browder v. Nicholson

226 F. App'x 999

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 22, 2007·No. No. 2007-7197·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Joe A. Browder, Jr. submits correspondence stating that the submission that was [1000]*1000treated as a notice of appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in Browder v. Nicholson, No. 07-0338, 2007 WL 956934 (Vet.App.) did not seek appellate review of that court’s decision. We treat Browder’s submission as a motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Joe A. Browder, Jr. submits correspondence stating that the submission that was [1000]*1000treated as a notice of appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in Browder v. Nicholson, No. 07-0338, 2007 WL 956934 (Vet.App.) did not seek appellate review of that court’s decision. We treat Browder’s submission as a motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Browder v. Nicholson, 226 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

226 F. App'x 999 (Browder v. Nicholson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.