Browd v. United National Bank of Miami
This text of 575 So. 2d 226 (Browd v. United National Bank of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary Ann Browd appeals a summary final judgment entered against her. First, the trial court correctly interpreted the personal guaranty to authorize multiple extensions of time, consistent with the requirements of section 673.118, Florida Statutes (1989). Second, we concur with the trial court that there was no novation. Finally, as the personal guaranty was not revoked in accordance with its terms, it remained in force at the time of all subsequent exten[227]*227sions of credit, properly entered. Summary judgment was
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 So. 2d 226, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 377, 1991 WL 4337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browd-v-united-national-bank-of-miami-fladistctapp-1991.