Browarek v. Pfalzer
This text of 174 A.D.2d 1054 (Browarek v. Pfalzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The negligence, if any, of defendant Raymond Pfalzer in causing his grandfather’s automobile to become stuck in the mud was not the proximate cause of the infant plaintiffs injury. Defendant could not have reasonably foreseen that, in attempting to extricate the car from the mud, the driver of a truck would leave the truck unattended, permitting it to roll down a slope and pin plaintiff against the car (see, Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950, mod, 46 NY2d 770; Scott v Mead, 132 AD2d 755). Summary judgment, therefore, should be entered in favor of defendants Raymond and Donald Pfalzer. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A.D.2d 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browarek-v-pfalzer-nyappdiv-1991.