Broward County v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Broward County v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc.

435 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21722

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 1983

DocketNo. 82-2487

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 435 So. 2d 309 (Broward County v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broward County v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 435 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal by Broward County from an order of taking. In the absence of fundamental error, we would affirm because the county let everything occur in the trial court about which it now complains without objection. On appeal it raises several arguable positions about which it was mute when the hearing was being conducted. All of the questions posed by the property owner’s attorney stood without objection as did the trial court’s interruption of the county’s attorney in the questioning of the county’s witness. Further, there was no objection to the closing argument of the property owner’s attorney nor any argument by the county. Accordingly, the train ordinarily would have left the station.

Fortunately for the taxpayers of Broward County, given the complete absence of basis in the pleadings for the trial [310]*310court’s action, coupled with the dire need for the strict accounting of all limited public funds available for all governmental purposes, we believe fundamental error to have occurred. Specifically, the trial court required Broward County, the condemning authority, to place money in the registry of the court for a parcel of property which was not alleged by said authority to be the subject of condemnation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to reduce the sum which has been deposited in the registry of the court by $200,000.00.

BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal by Broward County from an order of taking. In the absence of fundamental error, we would affirm because the county let everything occur in the trial court about which it now complains without objection. On appeal it raises several arguable positions about which it was mute when the hearing was being conducted. All of the questions posed by the property owner’s attorney stood without objection as did the trial court’s interruption of the county’s attorney in the questioning of the county’s witness. Further, there was no objection to the closing argument of the property owner’s attorney nor any argument by the county. Accordingly, the train ordinarily would have left the station.

Fortunately for the taxpayers of Broward County, given the complete absence of basis in the pleadings for the trial [310]*310court’s action, coupled with the dire need for the strict accounting of all limited public funds available for all governmental purposes, we believe fundamental error to have occurred. Specifically, the trial court required Broward County, the condemning authority, to place money in the registry of the court for a parcel of property which was not alleged by said authority to be the subject of condemnation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to reduce the sum which has been deposited in the registry of the court by $200,000.00.

BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broward-county-v-greyhound-rent-a-car-inc-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack