Broward County v. Eaton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Broward County v. Eaton

432 So. 2d 132

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1983

DocketNo. 81-1210

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 432 So. 2d 132 (Broward County v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broward County v. Eaton, 432 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court determined that the county had acted improperly in completely terminating access to appellee’s property from an adjacent public roadway. Upon review of the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, we do not believe reversible error has been demonstrated. Cf. Pinellas County v. Austin, 323 So.2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court determined that the county had acted improperly in completely terminating access to appellee’s property from an adjacent public roadway. Upon review of the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, we do not believe reversible error has been demonstrated. Cf. Pinellas County v. Austin, 323 So.2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 So. 2d 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broward-county-v-eaton-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack