Broward County v. Eaton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Broward County v. Eaton

432 So. 2d 132

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 1983·No. No. 81-1210·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court determined that the county had acted improperly in completely terminating access to appellee’s property from an adjacent public roadway. Upon review of the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, we do not believe reversible error has been demonstrated. Cf. Pinellas County v. Austin, 323 So.2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court determined that the county had acted improperly in completely terminating access to appellee’s property from an adjacent public roadway. Upon review of the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, we do not believe reversible error has been demonstrated. Cf. Pinellas County v. Austin, 323 So.2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Broward County v. Eaton, 432 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

432 So. 2d 132 (Broward County v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related