Broward County v. Alsdorf

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Broward County v. Alsdorf

306 So. 2d 534, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7339

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1974·No. No. 74-982·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the interlocutory orders on appeal we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. At this juncture we can find no prejudice in the action taken by the trial court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. With respect to the order directing defendant to answer interrogatories we are not persuaded that the entry of the order was beyond the trial court’s authority nor inappropriate under the case as postured before the trial court. See Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corporation, 89 Fla. 446, 105 So. 126 (1925).

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the interlocutory orders on appeal we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. At this juncture we can find no prejudice in the action taken by the trial court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. With respect to the order directing defendant to answer interrogatories we are not persuaded that the entry of the order was beyond the trial court’s authority nor inappropriate under the case as postured before the trial court. See Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corporation, 89 Fla. 446, 105 So. 126 (1925).

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Broward County v. Alsdorf, 306 So. 2d 534, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

306 So. 2d 534 (Broward County v. Alsdorf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related