Broussard v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
This text of 117 F. Supp. 81 (Broussard v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff here seeks to annul, on grounds of alleged fraud, a judgment entered by the Fifteenth Judicial District Court of Louisiana, Lafayette Parish, on April 12, 1946.
The judgment, in Cause No. 12906 on the docket of that Court, entitled “Marcille Broussard v„ Southern Cotton Oil [82]*82Company”, approved settlement of a claim made by plaintiff against defendant under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law, LSA-R.S. 23:1021 et seq. Here, as stated, plaintiff seeks to have the State Court judgment annulled and to have further judgment against defendant in the sum of $5,049.-94, for alleged total permanent disability.
Defendant has filed several motions, only one of which it is necessary to consider — a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
It is now settled beyond question that federal courts lack jurisdiction to vacate or set aside judgments or decrees of state courts. Randall v. Howard, 2 Black 585, 67 U.S. 585, 17 L.Ed. 269; Nougué v. Clapp, 101 U.S. 551, 25 L.Ed. 1026; Jones v. Medlock, 10 Cir., 180 F.2d 658, certiorari denied, 340 U.S. 819, 71 S.Ct. 50, 95 L.Ed. 602; Llano Del Rio Co. of Nev. v. Anderson-Post Hardwood Lumber Co., D.C., 79 F.Supp. 382; Id., 5 Cir., 187 F.2d 235.
The motion is good. It is sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 F. Supp. 81, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broussard-v-southern-cotton-oil-co-lawd-1953.