Broussard v. Guidry

21 La. Ann. 618
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 15, 1869
DocketNo. 650
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 La. Ann. 618 (Broussard v. Guidry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broussard v. Guidry, 21 La. Ann. 618 (La. 1869).

Opinion

Howe, J.

The judgment in this case was rendered against Guidry, and Dupré, administrator, in solido, upon a promissory note made by Guidry and Cyprien Dupre, in solido.

The administrator alone has appealed, and has not made Guidry a party to the appeal. The court will ex offieio notice the want of proper parties. Swearingen v. McDaniel, 12 Rob. 203 ; Robert v. Ride, 11 Ann. 409; Simmons v. His Creditors, 12 Ann. 755; Gibson v. Selby, 3 Ann. 318; Lobelle v. Lobelle, 5 Ann. 174; Cotton v. Sterling, 19 Ann. 137.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed with costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Item Co., Limited v. St. Tammany Hotel
172 So. 792 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
McCutchen v. Hudson
61 So. 157 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 La. Ann. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broussard-v-guidry-la-1869.