Broussard v. Guidry

21 La. Ann. 618
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 15, 1869·No. No. 650·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Howe, J.

The judgment in this case was rendered against Guidry, and Dupré, administrator, in solido, upon a promissory note made by Guidry and Cyprien Dupre, in solido.

The administrator alone has appealed, and has not made Guidry a party to the appeal. The court will ex offieio notice the want of proper parties. Swearingen v. McDaniel, 12 Rob. 203 ; Robert v. Ride, 11 Ann. 409; Simmons v. His Creditors, 12 Ann. 755; Gibson v. Selby, 3 Ann. 318; Lobelle v. Lobelle, 5 Ann. 174; Cotton v. Sterling, 19 Ann. 137.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed with costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broussard v. Guidry, 21 La. Ann. 618 (La. 1869).

21 La. Ann. 618 (Broussard v. Guidry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Item Co., Limited v. St. Tammany Hotel
172 So. 792 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
McCutchen v. Hudson
61 So. 157 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)