Broussard v. Champagne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Broussard v. Champagne

376 So. 2d 957, 1979 La. LEXIS 7799

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 28, 1979·No. No. 65211·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Mabel Solomon Broussard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Martin. No. 30061.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, we cannot say the result is incorrect. However, our denial is expressly without prejudice to any rights Mabel Solomon Broussard and Andrew Broussard may have to the property they acquired by deed, they not having been joined in the partition suit on the basis of their capacity as purchasers and they not having been named as defendants. La.C.C. Art. 2286.

SUMMERS, C. J. would deny the writ without qualification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mabel Solomon Broussard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Martin. No. 30061.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, we cannot say the result is incorrect. However, our denial is expressly without prejudice to any rights Mabel Solomon Broussard and Andrew Broussard may have to the property they acquired by deed, they not having been joined in the partition suit on the basis of their capacity as purchasers and they not having been named as defendants. La.C.C. Art. 2286.

SUMMERS, C. J. would deny the writ without qualification.

Broussard v. Champagne, 376 So. 2d 957, 1979 La. LEXIS 7799 (La. 1979).

Pincite

376 So. 2d 957 (Broussard v. Champagne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related