Broussard v. Champagne
This text of 376 So. 2d 957 (Broussard v. Champagne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Mabel Solomon Broussard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Martin. No. 30061.
Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, we cannot say the result is incorrect. However, our denial is expressly without prejudice to any rights Mabel Solomon Broussard and Andrew Broussard may have to the property they acquired by deed, they not having been joined in the partition suit on the basis of their capacity as purchasers and they not having been named as defendants. La.C.C. Art. 2286.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 So. 2d 957, 1979 La. LEXIS 7799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broussard-v-champagne-la-1979.