Broussard v. Apfel
This text of Broussard v. Apfel (Broussard v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 99-30842 -1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30842 Summary Calendar
LOVELACE J. BROUSSARD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CV-553 -------------------- March 28, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lovelace Broussard (“Broussard”) appeals the district
court’s decision to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction his
complaint seeking judicial review of his most recent application
for disability benefits. The district court did not err in
concluding that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the
complaint. See Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 108 (1977);
Hensley v. Califano, 601 F.2d 216, 216 (5th Cir. 1979). It also
did not err in concluding that it lacked mandamus jurisdiction
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-30842 -2-
over the complaint. See Green v. Heckler, 742 F.2d 237, 241 (5th
Cir. 1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Broussard v. Apfel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broussard-v-apfel-ca5-2000.