Broughton v. Tires Plus Car Care
This text of 22 So. 3d 156 (Broughton v. Tires Plus Car Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s October 6, 2009, order to show cause, the court GRANTS Appellees’ motion to dismiss and DISMISSES this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Troche v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 954 So.2d 685, 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“It is well settled that to be timely, a notice of [157]*157appeal must be filed in the appropriate court within the appropriate time period.”); Metro. Dade County v. Vasquez, 659 So.2d 355, 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 So. 3d 156, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18196, 2009 WL 4263788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broughton-v-tires-plus-car-care-fladistctapp-2009.