Broughton v. Tires Plus Car Care

22 So. 3d 156, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18196, 2009 WL 4263788
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2009·No. No. 1D09-4209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s October 6, 2009, order to show cause, the court GRANTS Appellees’ motion to dismiss and DISMISSES this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Troche v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 954 So.2d 685, 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“It is well settled that to be timely, a notice of [157]*157appeal must be filed in the appropriate court within the appropriate time period.”); Metro. Dade County v. Vasquez, 659 So.2d 355, 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction).

VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broughton v. Tires Plus Car Care, 22 So. 3d 156, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18196, 2009 WL 4263788 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

22 So. 3d 156 (Broughton v. Tires Plus Car Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Troche v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
954 So. 2d 685 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Vasquez
659 So. 2d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)