Broughton v. McClain

Fourth Circuit

Broughton v. McClain

647 F. App'x 221

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2016·No. No. 15-1569·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Celeste G. Broughton appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motion for disqualification of the district court judge. We have reviewed the [222] record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s We also deny Broughton’s most recent motion for reconsideration of this court’s prior order substituting the bankruptcy trustee as the Appellant as moot, as the trustee has been removed as the Appellant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Celeste G. Broughton appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motion for disqualification of the district court judge. We have reviewed the [222] record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s We also deny Broughton’s most recent motion for reconsideration of this court’s prior order substituting the bankruptcy trustee as the Appellant as moot, as the trustee has been removed as the Appellant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Broughton v. McClain, 647 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

647 F. App'x 221 (Broughton v. McClain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.