Broughton v. McClain

587 F. App'x 81
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2014·No. No. 14-2187·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert D. Broughton, Jr. ánd Celeste G. Broughton appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Broughton v. McClain, No. 5:13-cv-00454-H (E.D.N.C. July 22 & Sept. 29, 2014). We also deny the Appellants’ motion for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broughton v. McClain, 587 F. App'x 81 (4th Cir. 2014).

587 F. App'x 81 (Broughton v. McClain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broughton v. Gregory
E.D. North Carolina, 2019
Broughton v. McClain
602 F. App'x 133 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)