Brougher v. Lost Creek Drainage District

115 N.E. 190, 277 Ill. 156
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1917
DocketNo. 11121
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 115 N.E. 190 (Brougher v. Lost Creek Drainage District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brougher v. Lost Creek Drainage District, 115 N.E. 190, 277 Ill. 156 (Ill. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dunn

delivered the opinion of the court:

The Lost Creek Drainage District in White and Hamilton counties was organized by the order of the county court of White county under the Levee act. The main ditch of the district was laid out and constructed on the line of a natural water-course known as Lost creek, which crossed a certain highway in the town of Mill Shoals, in White county. In excavating the ditch along this water-course the commissioners removed a bridge in this highway, and, upon being requested by the plaintiff in error Brougher, the sole commissioner of highways of the town of Mill Shoals, refused to re-build the bridge. Thereupon the commissioner of highways and the town of Mill Shoals filed a petition in the circuit court of White county for mandamus requiring the commissioners of the drainage district to restore the bridge to its original condition. A demurrer was overruled to the plea of the defendants alleging that the ditch at the place where the bridge was removed was a natural watercourse, the petition was dismissed and the petitioners have appealed.

The plea was based upon the provision of section 55'of the Levee act, which requires the highway commissioners to construct at their own expense a bridge over a natural depression, channel or water-course which has been removed by a drainage district in the construction of its ditches. In the case of People v. Block, 276 Ill. 286, we have held that this provision is unconstitutional and that the drainage commissioners may be compelled to restore a bridge in a public highway which they have removed, by reason of such provision.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the plea.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Drainage District No. 5 v. Hamilton
61 N.E.2d 343 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1945)
People ex rel. Kurtz v. Meyer
251 Ill. App. 475 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 N.E. 190, 277 Ill. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brougher-v-lost-creek-drainage-district-ill-1917.