Brotzman v. Lindenfeld

133 Misc. 832, 234 N.Y.S. 79, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 742
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 9, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole claim of negligence herein was that the defendant, an abutting owner, permitted snow and ice to accumulate on a coal hole cover in the highway in front of his premises. The [833]*833snow and ice were normal accumulations. Negligence cannot be predicated on the failure of the abutting owner to remove such accumulation, even though there is a city ordinance requiring the owner to remove it. (City of Rochester v. Campbell, 123 N. Y. 405; Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 id. 598; Lee v. Ortiz, 249 id. 613; Thomp. Neg. § 1219.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Petebs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brotzman v. Lindenfeld, 133 Misc. 832, 234 N.Y.S. 79, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

133 Misc. 832 (Brotzman v. Lindenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Basson v. Heald
154 Misc. 593 (New York County Courts, 1934)
Childers v. Deschamps
290 P. 261 (Montana Supreme Court, 1930)