Brotman v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 264, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1407
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brotman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Cust. Ct. 251 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 17, 1949·No. No. 52945; protest 126387-K (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brotman v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 264, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1407 (cusc 1949).
22 Cust. Ct. 264 (Brotman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)