Brotman v. Traiman
127 A. 700, 101 N.J.L. 212, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 204
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Yan Buskirk, McG-lennon, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Campbell, Lloyd, Clark, Kays, JJ. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brotman v. Traiman, 127 A. 700, 101 N.J.L. 212, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1925).
127 A. 700 (Brotman v. Traiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.