Brotman v. Traiman
127 A. 700, 101 N.J.L. 212, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 204
This text of 127 A. 700 (Brotman v. Traiman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brotman v. Traiman, 127 A. 700, 101 N.J.L. 212, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Yan Buskirk, McG-lennon, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Campbell, Lloyd, Clark, Kays, JJ. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 A. 700, 101 N.J.L. 212, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brotman-v-traiman-nj-1925.