Brotherton v. Mart
6 Cal. 488
This text of 6 Cal. 488 (Brotherton v. Mart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brotherton v. Mart, 6 Cal. 488 (Cal. 1856).
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
The plaintiff having shown that his lost grant had been recorded, it [489]*489was error to admit parol evidence of its contents, unless the failure to produce the record was accounted for.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brotherton-v-mart-cal-1856.